Twelve Year Rule – clipping the long tail of rock & roll


Does even the greatest band stop producing great work after time?

What’s the premise?

A colleague at work made the following observation (my words): “All the great bands have a period of 12 years in which they release their best works. Even if they keep together for a lot longer, you can’t put their recent works in the same league as their best works.”

It seems to me that there is a lot of plausibility to this, but I thought I would think it through with some examples…

Hawkwind

As ever I will start with the Mighty Hawkwind – I think they’re great and it’s my blog. Their first album was 1970 and also called Hawkwind. If we add 12 years we get to 1982 – this gets us safely past Levitation and all the great 70s works. We are already in the territory of Choose Your Masques. To be honest IMHO I would go to 1984 and Chronicle of the Black Sword. This is outside the rule, includes some less classic albums (e.g. Church of Hawkwind) but misses the lesser (and here comes the flaming) albums since, all of which I still own and their are some decent tracks here and there.

Genesis

More comfortable territory for most readers, Genesis released Genesis to Revelation in 1969 so add on 12 to get to 1981. This gets to Abacab some of which I really like, includes Then There were Three which some people don’t like. It does miss the more popular later albums but I don’t think that causes a problem with the theory.

Pink Floyd

Cambridge local boys, they released Piper at the Gates of Dawn in 1967. Add on 12 to 1979 we get to The Wall. Case proved!

The Rolling Stones

In 1964 the Stones released The Rolling Stones so 12 gets to 1976 and Black and Blue. We are probably already into the tail of the classic period.

The Who

Releasing My Generation as late as 1965, 1977 just misses 1978s Who are You. Not far off though.

Yes

Yes released Yes in 1969 so again we look to 1981. This makes the cut before 90125 and everything since. Again some decent material gets left out but we have the mights 70s canon intact.

Conclusion

On my small sample, I think the 12 Year rule is a decent rule of thumb, and something I will apply wider when I get the time – no doubt it fails on some bands, but does provide an interesting point of view.

Advertisements

About Tony Jones
Big Finish writer, reviewer and blogger, I'm interested in science fiction and Doctor Who. I review for CultBox, The Doctor Who Companion and others. I am also Audio Drama editor for Starburst Magazine, and write the occasional piece for Vortex, the BSFA critical magazine.

2 Responses to Twelve Year Rule – clipping the long tail of rock & roll

  1. James French says:

    Mr Zimmerman?
    1962 – Lands on the Greenwich Village scene with Bob Dylan, rising on a trajectory through the 60’s, temporary failings in the late 60’s early 70’s, let us forget Self Portrait.
    1974 – Planet Waves – and inkling of a return.
    1975 – Blood on the Tracks. He’s back…
    1980 – Saved… uh oh… where’s this going?
    1986 – Knocked out Loaded – that’s where…
    1992 – Back in the game with Good as I Been to You, heading to the greatness that is Modern TImes in 2006.

    Is it possible that Bob is the exception that disproves the rule. There is perhaps somehting of the comet about him with the apoapsis happening with a regularity…

    Like

    • helmstone says:

      You make an interesting point. I will get back to you…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: